About the Wellness 2 Age program

What is the Wellness 2 Age program?

Wellness 2 Age is an innovative 10-week community-based program that focuses on multiple aspects of ageing by providing proactive strengths-based strategies that enable individuals over the age of 60 to maintain independence at home for longer and learn strategies for everyday life.

Over the period of the program, older people undertake a range of structured activities that focus on a holistic approach to targeting individual physical and cognitive challenges, while supporting social engagement needs. The program provides targeted activities that are graded to support individual needs, which are explicitly linked to home-based activities. These learned strategies can then easily translate into the older person’s everyday environment, ensuring that the program creates sustainable change for the older person, to enable wellness and independence.

Program outcomes include improved cognition, mobility, and social engagement for older people within the community.

Who is the program for?

Wellness 2 Age is targeted at older people who are motivated to remain living at home. They do not need to have had a specific diagnosis or injury to be involved or to undertake the program. For example, they may self-report finding it more difficult to do specific things, their balance may have deteriorated, or they may be finding it more difficult to get up and down stairs.

Conversely, if the individual has experienced an injury or received a diagnosis, this would not preclude them from taking part in the program. Even if the individual has been diagnosed with a condition such as Parkinsons disease, their eligibility for the program would still be explored.

Wellness 2 Age is not suitable for people that have severe cognitive impairment. As the participant will need to be able to follow instructions in completing the activities, you would be wanting to see them test in the mild to moderate range of cognitive impairment.

For older people who are motivated to remain living at home, Wellness 2 Age provides targeted and individualised strategies to build and maintain confidence in performing everyday tasks and activities, which enables older people to remain active and engaged within their communities.

For health professionals and care providers, Wellness 2 Age provides an opportunity to partner with older people in a new and holistic way to better support individual needs. This is achieved through targeted strategies that directly focus on keeping people independent and contributing to slowing the progression of chronic disease and disability, through an innovative and evidenced-based approach.

Who developed the Wellness 2 Age program?

The Wellness 2 Age program was developed in Australia by Dr Kristy Robson, Senior Research Fellow and Associate Professor Melissa Nott, Principal Research Fellow, both from Charles Sturt University’s Three Rivers Department of Rural Health. Dr Robson and A/Professor Nott are registered Allied Health Professionals.

What is the evidence-base for the program’s effectiveness?

The Wellness 2 Age program has been found to be effective in increasing social confidence, memory, and physical function, as outlined in the research studies below.

Summary
This pilot trial examined the feasibility and effectiveness of ‘Ageing Well’, a community-based program for improving cognitive skills and mobility of rural older people. The non-randomised, waitlist-controlled pilot trial was conducted at a regional NSW university clinic. 23 community-dwelling adults aged 60+ who had begun to experience a decline in their physical and/or cognitive abilities participated in the program. Participants engaged in dual-tasking activities that simultaneously challenged their motor and cognitive abilities. Student facilitators encouraged participants to progress through increasingly complex functional tasks in a range of contexts, including a café, supermarket and a simulated ‘home’. The Patient Reported Evaluation of Cognitive State (PRECiS) measured the impact of participant’s cognitive state in terms of how much they were ‘bothered’ by problems with their cognition. Functional mobility was measured by the Timed Up-and-Go (TUG), a test of static and dynamic balance, and the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). 75 community members requested to participate. Intervention participants’ PRECiS ratings in relation to impacts on their performance of everyday skills improved substantially, while the control group did not change (p=.04, ηp 2 =.18). Intervention participants walked 12% further in the 6MWT post intervention, while the control group distance did not change (p=.03, ηp2 =.22). TUG time was reduced by 1 second in the intervention group. There is strong interest in this dual-tasking program among older community-dwelling residents in this rural setting. The results of this pilot study support the feasibility and effectiveness of the Ageing Well program.

Aims
This pilot trial examined the feasibility and effectiveness of “Ageing Well,” a community-based program for improving cognitive skills and mobility of rural older people.

Outcomes
Intervention participants’ Patient Reported Evaluation of Cognitive State ratings in relation to impacts on their performance of everyday skills improved substantially, whereas the control group did not change. Intervention participants walked 12% further in the Six Minute Walk Test post-intervention, while the control group distance did not change. Timed Up-and-Go time was reduced by 1 second in the intervention group. There is a strong interest in this dual-tasking program among older community-dwelling residents in this rural setting. The results of this pilot study support the feasibility and effectiveness of the Ageing Well program

Citation
Nott, M., Robson, K., Murphy, K., Pope, R., Cuming, T., & Curtin, M. (2019). Ageing well: Pilot evaluation of a dual-task training program in a rural community. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 27(4), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12522

Summary
This paper investigates the perceived impact of the intergenerational component of an Ageing Well Program from the perspectives of the older adult and university student participants. An interpretative phenomenological analysis approach was used, with data being collected via semi-structured interviews. Seven older adults and six students who participated in the most recent program were interviewed. “Forming Connections,” “Getting to Know the Older Adults” and “Assisting the Students Through the Learning Process” were the key themes that emerged from the data. Ultimately, it was perceived that the inclusion of an intergenerational component was of greater benefit to the university students.

Aims
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the intergenerational component of the Ageing Well Program from the perspectives of the older adult and university student participants.

Outcomes
Both the older adults and university students perceived that the intergenerational component of the Ageing Well Program had an impact upon them. The development of a connection between the two generations through the concept of intergenerational solidarity was of utmost importance to everyone involved. Communicating meaningfully and being relatable were two strategies that contributed to a student’s ability to connect with the older adults. Students who had previous experience working with older adults tended to be more successful in implementing these strategies. While many of the students had preconceived opinions about older adults prior to their participation in the program, getting to know them on a more personal level challenged these stereotypes and resulted in the students having a better understanding of the aging process. The older adults were able to assist the students throughout the learning process and helped them to recognize how they could adapt their treatment to accommodate for any difficulties associated with aging. From the perspective of the older adults, the incorporation of an intergenerational component within the Ageing Well Program was of greater benefit to the university students.

Citation
van der Veen, R., Robson, K., & Curtin, M. (2023). The Perceived Impact of the Intergenerational Component of an Ageing Well Program. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2023.2272812

Summary
A focus on healthy aging can enhance activity participation, and reduce the impact of chronic diseases and decline in function. Interpretive phenomenological analysis was used to explore the perspectives of nine participants of a university run Aging Well Program (AWP) 12 months following its completion. Analysis of the semi-structured interviews conducted, identified three key themes: 1) Using strategies to keep your mind alert; 2) I now know what to do to maintain my physical wellbeing; and 3) Connections with others. The findings indicated that the Ageing Well Program had long-term positive cognitive, physical and social impacts, from the perspectives of the participants.

Aims
the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of participating in the Ageing Well Program from the perspective of the participants, at least 12 months following the completion of the Program.

Outcomes
Participants of the Ageing Well Program spoke of the strategies they continued to implement 12 months following completion. The findings indicate that participants’ understanding of wellbeing and their own capacities increased, and they continued to implement physical and cognitive strategies over the long-term. When talking about cognitive strategies, participants discussed the importance of keeping mentally active, maintaining their memory, and being mindful, as beneficial strategies to continue to implement as they age. Additionally, they spoke of how their understanding on the benefits and ways to be physically active increased, including how to prevent and manage falls. An increase in social confidence, understanding and engagement was also identified by participants as a positive outcome of the group-based nature of the Ageing Well Program. These findings reflect the findings of other research, suggesting that strategies focusing on healthy aging were impactful when activities were tailored to each participant’s goals and capabilities. The outcomes further demonstrated the importance of the inclusion of meaningful activities for each individual to ensure activities are relevant to each participant and it can be applied to their real-life situations to facilitate ongoing use of strategies. In addition, the findings demonstrated that a focus on healthy aging can have long-term impacts on individuals, so an emphasis should be given to ensuring positions in such programs are allocated to new candidates rather than allowing previous candidates to repeat the program. However, despite the range of benefits of healthy aging, there is a paucity of literature that evaluates long-term outcomes and the perspectives of the participants. Further research evaluating these aspects is needed to enable effective healthy aging.

Citation
Timmermans, E., Robson, K., & Curtin, M. (2023). The perceived long-term impact of an ageing well program. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 47(2), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2022.2028051

How is the program delivered?

The Wellness 2 Age program can only be delivered by trained allied health care professionals, allied health assistants, and aged care staff in community-based service contexts who have completed the Wellness 2 Age training course and obtained the program certification. You must have obtained the Wellness 2 Age Facilitator Certification to deliver the program.

You might consider having at least two staff members certified in your organisation to allow for wider delivery or to cater for limitations in staff availability. The program can be delivered with just one facilitator, and an allied health assistant can run the activities, however at least one allied health professional or health professional is required to oversee the program delivery as they will be required to interpret the results of the outcome measures around the individual goals and assign the activities.

The training program consists of:

  • Four self-directed online modules and an online competency quiz (total 2 hours)
  • One face-to-face online workshop (total 5 hours to be completed in one sitting)

These take about seven hours in total to complete and can count towards continuing professional development (CPD) points. You will be awarded a certificate upon completion.

Equipment
Each of the program activities requires a range of equipment to deliver the program. This can comprise of freely everyday household items such as a washing basket, tennis balls, a wall, or empty plastic bottles; to items which need to be purchased such as basketballs, soccer balls, swiss balls, medicine balls, parallel bars, mini basketball hoops, and proprioceptive pads.

Most of the equipment required to run the program is comprised of everyday household items or items that are commonly owned by many allied health organisations. Otherwise, they can be easily obtained at a low cost.

A list of the equipment and low-cost purchasing options is provided in the Facilitators Portal located on the Program Training page. However, please get in touch with us if you have any questions.

Resources
Once you complete the training, you will have access to the Facilitators Portal where you can access the relevant resources containing the printable resources required for some of the activities, which you can laminate and reuse.

Classes are designed to be delivered via a 10-week program that focuses on completing a range of targeted activities that are graded to support individual goals and are explicitly linked to home-based activities.

Class delivery
Wellness 2 Age is designed to be delivered to participants via one 1-hour session per week for 10 weeks.

Number of participants per class
Classes should ideally be comprised of between 6-12 participants per class depending on staffing ratios.

The program measures success by using a range of pre and post outcome measures that you can upload as de-identified data into the Wellness 2 Age online portal. Once uploaded onto the portal, you can then access all the data from your organisation, download reports of participant’s results, and provide certificates to each participate based on their individual outcomes.

What are the benefits for running Wellness 2 Age Wellness 2 Age at your organisation or community-based facility?

Wellness 2 Age is an innovative program that focuses on proactive approaches to support older people in a strengths-based approach.

Wellness 2 Age can be offered within existing funding mechanisms for older people wanting to participate. This may enable no cost or low cost to the participants and a cost recovery model to your organisation.

Organisations can recover the cost of delivering the program by charging the participants for their participation in the program. Participants may be able to use a range of funding options to support their participation in the program, including:

  • Consumer Directed Care (CDC) home care packages
  • Transitional Care Programmes (TPC)
  • Commonwealth Home Support Programmes (CHSP)
  • Short Term Restorative Care programmes (STRC)
  • National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)
  • Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS) Chronic Disease Management
  • Private Health Funds
  • Self-Funded programs

The program can be offered as a complimentary service alongside other services that your organisation provides. This can be an attractive option for potential or existing clients of your organisation.

The program is specifically designed to measure pre and post outcomes measures for each participant. Analysis of the benefit of the program can then be provided as valuable evidence to executive staff within your organisation to demonstrate its effectiveness and justify further marketing and delivery of the program.

The Wellness 2 Age program has been found to be effective in increasing social confidence, memory, and physical function. Here’s some of the feedback received from program participants.

“Yes, I would say that it has boosted my confidence about being more social yes, I would say that. I think it has just given me more confidence with talking to other people. Normally, if I get into a crowd, I sort of stand back and wait for somebody else to say hi to me before I say hi to them, if you know what I mean. But now I will go up to them say hi” (Ben)

“All those things are important to your well-being, like socializing, exercising, eating correctly, practicing your memory. It just makes you more aware, that’s what I guess is the main thing as far as I was concerned.” (Lucy)

“It pointed me to the idea that sometimes doing the physical activities you can do them in an enjoyment way.” (Fred)

Want to deliver this program at your organisation or community-based setting? Get trained now!